Wolverines

Public Forums => Open Discussion => Topic started by: Snackcakes on November 26, 2008, 07:58:49 PM



Title: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Snackcakes on November 26, 2008, 07:58:49 PM
So some friends and I decided to have a fitness challenge. Where the loser must submit to the will of the winners and be flown one way to an undisclosed location with only the clothes on their back, pre-paid go phone, and just enough cash to buy a one way bus ticket back. Where is the worst possible place we can send the loser? gr0n suggested Wichita Falls, Texas. Apparently it is the suck. What do you think?


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: thrun on November 26, 2008, 08:02:41 PM
Fuck that, Gary indiana.  It's not far but that place is a shithole.  And the trip across indiana is mind numbing. 


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Gristle on November 26, 2008, 08:28:15 PM
Varg's House...North Augusta, South Carolina.  Actually anywhere in South Carolina will do.


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Varg on November 26, 2008, 08:33:52 PM
Witchita Falls Texas is pretty fucking horrible.


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Okarn on November 26, 2008, 08:49:16 PM
Jasper, Arkansas...Troyer can attest to this.

Or if you really don't want him to come back, just send him to downtown Detroit.  You even get to save on paying for the bus ticket home.


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Troyer on November 26, 2008, 09:03:33 PM
I can attest to Okarn's claim.

You could also send him to Guam...ride THAT bus home, bitches.


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Jim Tressel on November 26, 2008, 09:35:49 PM
New Orleans.  Only because then they would have to ride the bus across the Lake Pontchartrain bridge which is the scariest experience you can have with your pants on.  

Oh, also because New Orleans fucking sucks.  Who the fuck builds a city on a fucking swamp?!  A french asshole, that's who.  Fuck New Orleans and frankly fuck anyone who insists on living on the coast then pisses and moans when their shit gets ruined.  Move inland assholes.  You know what, nevermind.  Stay right where you are.  I don't want you bringing your dipshit ideas into my gated community. 


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Reddawn on November 26, 2008, 09:46:19 PM
Fly him to Boise. Tell him to punch Arctic in the balls and then have him enjoy that fucking bus ride home.


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Unnormal on November 26, 2008, 10:02:13 PM
exploit the loop hole -----> Honolulu Hawaii. Enjoy that bus ride back you fat fitness contest loser.


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Arctic on November 26, 2008, 10:32:33 PM
I would say anywere in Wyoming or Montanna, If you really want to be mean send him to Salt Lake city, Momrmon country is alway a fun place to be if you dont like to do anything fun and be in bed by 10 ..


and Red just wait till you moveout here


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Bleedhoof on November 26, 2008, 11:43:38 PM
somewhere in the mountains of wv.   


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Kastil on November 27, 2008, 12:59:48 AM
Scary place?  Any place scarier than Little Rock, Arkansas?   What about St. Louis Missouri?  That place is also hell.


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Unnormal on November 27, 2008, 02:09:55 AM
Scary place?  Any place scarier than Little Rock, Arkansas?   What about St. Louis Missouri?  That place is also hell.

If your going to send them to the Lou just send them to springfield mo; that way i can greet them at the airport mock them. They will have to drive through stl to get back to the c-bus anyway.


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Ellanorah on November 27, 2008, 07:43:03 AM
I would say anywere in Wyoming or Montanna, If you really want to be mean send him to Salt Lake city, Momrmon country is alway a fun place to be if you dont like to do anything fun and be in bed by 10 ..


and Red just wait till you moveout here


....my mormon-ness is slightly offended...although, we call Utah the Mormon Bubble, because they have some crazy ass ideas there...


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Ott on November 27, 2008, 08:58:08 AM

You could also send him to Guam...ride THAT bus home, bitches.

exploit the loop hole -----> Honolulu Hawaii. Enjoy that bus ride back you fat fitness contest loser.

I'd lose on purpose and never come back :)

But seriously...Little rock or Detroit


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Troyer on November 27, 2008, 12:26:06 PM
Barrow, Alaska.  Not only is it the farthest north city in the U.S. but since they don't get their wallet or passport it'll add an extra element of surprise on the trip home...


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: ch0wdah on November 27, 2008, 01:34:39 PM
Wow, let's see. 

Athens, Georgia
Tuscaloosa
Ardmore, AL/TN
Oneonta, AL
Actually, any town in Alabama that starts with a vowel, and if you are trying to make the trip back to Ohio extra Alabama special, pick someplace on the far end of the state like Florala.
For that matter, somewhere in Florida would make the bus ride quite grueling and go through a lot of humid south.
College Station, Texas, though El Paso would be good for the whole far side of Texas feel. 

I think I might have to pick somewhere in the south, and as far from the interstate as possible.  How close to Panama City, FL can you get but not get to see the beach?


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: skeanthu on November 27, 2008, 04:22:48 PM
Static, Tennessee.  Yes it really exists, and I opted for the walking route:

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&saddr=Columbus,+OH&daddr=Static,+Tennessee&hl=en&geocode=&mra=ls&dirflg=w&sll=38.248545,-84.10005&sspn=3.869322,8.459473&ie=UTF8&ll=38.251123,-84.001465&spn=3.869093,8.459473&z=8 (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&saddr=Columbus,+OH&daddr=Static,+Tennessee&hl=en&geocode=&mra=ls&dirflg=w&sll=38.248545,-84.10005&sspn=3.869322,8.459473&ie=UTF8&ll=38.251123,-84.001465&spn=3.869093,8.459473&z=8)


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: ch0wdah on November 28, 2008, 10:26:14 AM
Undisclosed location.  So is Buenos Aires fair game?  That would be a bus ride.  Or 20.

Otherwise, which criteria are most important?  The hassle of getting from the airport to the bus terminal and the awfulness of the time spent getting on the bus?  The length of the bus ride?  I guess there is no meal money, so a really long trip would be pretty hungry or involve some kind of bus trip exchange of goods and services.

Looking at a map trying to pick places that would perhaps include less interstate travel and more US highway travel, I came up with Eureka, CA; Medford, OR; Del Rio, TX; and Panama City, FL.  Oakland, CA seems like it might be an awful place to catch a bus.  Key West seems really damn far away.

EDIT:  Trying to fly to one of the more remote places I listed involves changing planes.  Wouldn't you just get off the frst plane and take the bus back from the more civilized location?


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Troyer on November 28, 2008, 03:41:17 PM
Cowz suggests Deliverance, Georgia.  Squeel, boy! <Cue banjo music>


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Varg on November 28, 2008, 04:05:58 PM
Whats wrong with Athens?


Title: Re: Worst place to visit?
Post by: Redbear8 on November 28, 2008, 06:31:33 PM
While Arkansas does really suck.....a lot, there are a ton of interstates that are easily accessible. My vote would be to somewhere that's way the fuck out there.

Del Rio Texas is a good call. El Paso, while there is an interstate there, would suck horribly. Miles and miles of boring desert, lots of nasty people on the bus, and a fair to midland chance the bus will actually break down. Also, there is an 80% chance someone on the bus would have a chicken.

El Paso is my vote.


fmclip.com